Most of universities and colleges have been changing in big scale their admission process today, which are to offer students an another opportunity for new educative direction of design sector. They are replacing admission test for students' high school records to especially practical skill test, while some of them which had only practical skill test offers another non-practical skill test as well. This study is the firstly attempt as to design training policy by observation of design sketch class provided by universities and colleges, it is thus hoped that this will abstract some competent and performant differences among the students selected from practical skill test and the students from non-practical skill test. This will give an idea for design training in solving communication problems of the two groups. The principal observation of this paper is whether there is any competent difference for sketching between the two groups. The criteria are divided by some important sketching categories: formal accuracy, compositional creation, shading balance, and perspective variability as primordial sketching fundamental; objet representivity, lines, arrangements and composition, light direction, shading style, perspective and perspection, objet positioning etc as additional sketching performance to the first categories which would serve for exploitative factors. There are arguments in favour and against and this paper provides a short review. On balance, the positive aspects of a traditional sketching training should not outweigh the negative ones for the students from non-practical skill test. The novelty of the paper is the attempt to address the critical voices to the traditional training system and offers some effective consideration to be sensible to pay more attention to change their given curriculum.
발행일 : 2018.06
발표지 : 일러스트레이션포럼
통권 : Vol.55 (2018.06)
페이지 : pp.113-122
발행기관 : (사)한국일러스트레이션학회